User talk:Nv8200pa

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thanks so much for the lovely photo of the McWhirter House in Belton, TX. I am writing an article about Martha McWhirter and the Sanctificationists. I will be sure to link back to the photograph, and also to properly attribute the photo to you. Thanks again. AnaSoc (talk) 20:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Susan Orlean.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
  • Hopefully it is correct now. Nv8200p (talk) 11:20, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaston Museum Joinerville Texas 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Independent Austin Texas NE Corner 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 01:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aurora apartment hotel san antonio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brazos valley african american museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clifton college admin building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dr E L and Nannie Lewis Walker House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cassaday Grey Granite Company Office Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:07, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Immaculate Conception Isla Mujeres 2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Concho San Saba and Llano Valley Railroad Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blanco courthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange county tx courthouse 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuero Texas Knights of Pythias Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Downtown Stamford Texas 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Why do you reduce the size of your photos? --Moroder 04:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former Bay St Louis MS Post Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 16:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! George Childress Centennial Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Jakubhal 14:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Godley School Main Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:54, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! First national bank and trust building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Old MacKenzie Trail Texas Centennial Monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Hidalgo County Jail Edinburg Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:54, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stony Point High School Auditorium Round Rock Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok for me --Jakubhal 18:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dr Jacob Moore Frazier House Belton Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobin Land Bridge San Antonio Texas Skywalk 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capital MetroRail MLK Jr Station 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Sweden Lutheran Church Travis County Texas 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:43, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! W Y Penn Home Georgetown Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Post Office Building Round Rock Texas 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some strange green and yellow artifacts on the clouds and over roof --Jakubhal 18:17, 1 September 2021 (UTC)  Done. New version uploaded. I believe all the artifacts are removed Nv8200pa 10:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Floyd County Texas Courthouse 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Marble Falls Texas 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some dust spots that need to be removed (one above the building on the left e.g.) --FlocciNivis 15:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC) Removed dust spots Nv8200pa 20:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View Through Mesa Arch Canyonlands NP Utah 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 10:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Patrolling uploads

Please notify users about problems with their files. Help:Gadget-UserMessages is very helpful for this purpose. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Could you be more specific about what you are referring to? Nv8200p (talk) 14:39, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

For example, you added {{SD}} on File:Simulador 360VIRTU.jpg, but there is no {{Project scope}} or {{No advertising}} on User talk:360VIRTU.

You could use {{Ping}} on existing conversation if you need somebody attention instead of copying entire conversation on other user talk page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for reminder, but I still did not see notifications for files recently tagged by you. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: I thought there was a bot adding the notifications for speedy deletes now. I swore I saw that happening. I will start adding the notifications myself. Regards Nv8200pa (talk) 19:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

In some recent cases it was me :-) EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Please check out User talk:Oln moksha. I'm not crazy! I missed the notifications to this User and two notifications were added by User:Deletion Notification Bot 2 Nv8200pa (talk) 00:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

May be bot is adding such notifications in some situations, but not always. My requests in this conversation come after I discovered that many notifications are not appearing on user talk pages. I always check user talk pages and add missing notifications before deletions. So will be good idea to perform task yourself. It's not too hard after all. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cleopatra Terrace Yellowstone NP 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:25, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Window Devils Tower 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:38, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Idea...

Hi @Nv8200pa: Don't you think uploads from ROHIT SINGH from India are more "Advertising" in nature, than being "personal photos by non-contributors". Images like File:KPS MEERUT LAB.jpg seem to have an educational value. _Regards, Aafi ^(talk) 17:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• @Aafi: Made a judgement call. I thought about advertising, but didn't see the anything between the user and the images that made me feel it was a promotion. If I run across a similar group of images, I'll look at it a little harder. I believe in the administrators to set things right if I make a mistake or get out of line. Please correct File:KPS MEERUT LAB.jpg et al, however policy dictates. Thanks, and regards, Nv8200p (talk) 19:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moth Caterpillar Brazos Bend State Park Texas 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Can you please...

...work a little more carefully when nominating candidates for speedy deletion? Images like File:Misti Dawn 2017.jpg or File:Kadia Saraf.jpg are not Speedydelete canditates, especially if they have a VRT ticket on file? A no-name company probably wouldn't necessarily need one. And I really hope you check online first to see who the person actually is you're suggesting to speedydelete with F10 and if they have any Wikipediaarticle. Best regards, זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 12:42, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I'll try and do better, but we all make mistakes. Fortunately, there are admins and others that keep me in check. Regards. Nv8200pa (talk) 12:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 13:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed that you nominated a number of files for "CSD G10 (files and pages created as advertisements)". Actually it would be much better to nominate them for copyright violation. It is not clear if they are advertisements. There is no external link, so it depends on the notability of the subject and other factors. However promotion pictures and album covers are readily deleted unless there is a formal VRT permission. That's easier to check. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

@Yann: So you are recommending when I nominate promotion pictures and album covers images I should use "CSD F1 (clear copyright violation)"? Nv8200pa (talk) 16:13, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Yes, that's it. Yann (talk) 16:43, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Evidence of copyvio

Please note that COM:CSD#F1 requires "evidence that no Commons-compatible licensing has been issued by the copyright holder", such as a link to prior publication of the image on an external website without a free license. You should not tag images as copyvio simply because they look like they were not created by the uploader. For those, you can use {{subst:npd}} or COM:DR. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:28, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

@Yann: Can you weigh in on this comment because this was not the vibe I was getting from you on using CSD F1. Thanks, Nv8200pa (talk) 22:56, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Yes, some of your speedy deletions should have been regular deletions: We need some evidence that the image is a copyright violation (copies elsewhere, metadata, etc.). Also comparing with other images by the same uploader is useful: selfies of different people, EXIF with different names, EXIF with FBMD, EXIF with agencies (Getty, etc.), high-end professional camera vs. mobile phone, etc. Yann (talk) 12:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, I've noticed that you are tagging images for speedy deletion just because the copyright holder in the EXIF does not appear to match the uploader's username. This is problematic because: 1) Sometimes a person might put their real name in the metadata and go by a pseudonym as their username or vice versa, or use different pseudonyms. 2) People are allowed to upload works created by others, as long as a COM:VRT permission comes in a timely manner. They are supposed to add {{subst:PP}} which indicates that the image is pending VRT and gives it a grace period of 30 days, but the instruction is not always clear, so not every uploader tags it properly. In these cases, if we believe that the uploader is not the copyright holder but do not have direct proof of copyvio, we use {{subst:npd}} which gives the uploader a grace period of 7 days. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Also, please be more careful. You tagged File:ULYSSES PORTRAITS0189.jpg for F10 but it is not a personal photo; if you look more closely at the description and categories, it is part of a series of portraits taken by the uploader as part of AfroCrowd. And in these two edits (1 2), you used an edit summary of "Speedy delete request" even though your edit was very much not to tag the image for speedy deletion; while there's no direct harm from this incorrect edit summary, it suggests that you should slow down and take more care when making edits. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Barbs B Q Storefront Lockhart Texas 2025.jpg

Copyright status: File:Barbs B Q Storefront Lockhart Texas 2025.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Barbs B Q Storefront Lockhart Texas 2025.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:SW Museum of Clocks and Watches Lockhart Texas 2025.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:58, 21 June 2025 (UTC)